Run the tool when
A teammate will keep it.
Zapier, Make, n8n, and Lindy are reasonable to run yourselves when someone on the team can open the workflow after it breaks and explain the step.
Five live comparisons
Name the reader.
Then choose.
A repeated job still depends on memory, and these pages help you choose a tool, a hire, or a system we keep.
Direct answer
Name the owner before the tool.
Write the job in a paragraph, list the apps it touches, and write the name of the person who would open it after a failure. If that name is already on the team, start with the tool page. If the line is blank, read the path where we build it and stay with it.
Have it built when
Nobody owns the repair.
We build the system and stay on the repair. Someone you name still approves anything a customer would be told before it goes out.
Hire when
The week stays full.
Open a seat when you can describe a full week and the person you hire can read the workflow. Otherwise leave the seat closed and have the job built.
All comparisons
Pick the question you are weighing.
Compare
Zapier yourself
The apps already need connecting. Keep the Zaps in your account when a teammate can open one that stopped, or have us build the workflow and read the failures.
Compare
Make yourself
A scenario is only useful if someone redraws it. Stay on Make's canvas when a teammate will, or have that job delivered and kept.
Compare
n8n yourself
The source is useful when a technical person wants it. Host n8n yourself in that case, or have us run the workflow when that person is not on staff.
Compare
Hire or have it built
A posting is a guess until you can describe the week. Hire when the week stays full, or have the system built and leave the seat closed.
Compare
Lindy or a build
Inbox triage and scheduling can start on Lindy the same day. Have us build the system when a wrong answer would reach a customer.
Decision rules
What to settle before you pick.
A useful comparison names the job, the person who would keep it, the approval before a customer hears anything, and the sign that the choice was the right one.
Work
Which repeated job should move out of memory and into a workflow someone can open?
Owner
Who on the team will read that workflow after a step stops, this month and next?
Review
Who approves a customer-facing promise before it is sent, drafted, or spoken?
Signal
Which number you already keep would tell you the workflow is doing the job you named?
Questions answered
AI comparison questions.
What are these comparisons actually deciding?
Each page asks who keeps the job after the first setup. Four of them set a tool your team can run against a system we build and stay with. The hire page asks whether that keeper should be an employee you recruit.
When is doing it yourself the better path?
When someone already on the team will keep the workflow and can open it after a failure. A consultant can help with the first wiring. The account still needs that person once the consultant is done.
What does a person still approve?
Anything a customer would be promised, sent, or told. We can draft the step. Someone you name approves it before it goes out. That approval stays whether your team runs the tool or we keep the system.
Next step
Bring the job you are stuck on.
We look at one job with you, name who would have to keep it, and say whether to run the tool yourselves, hire for it, or have us build the system.
Get your free Systems Plan